Open AccessAmbient Particulate Matter Size Distributions Drive Regional and Global Variability in Particle Deposition in the Respiratory Tract
Author(s) -
Kodros J. K.,
Volckens J.,
Jathar S. H.,
Pierce J. R.
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
geohealth
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.889
H-Index - 12
ISSN - 2471-1403
DOI - 10.1029/2018gh000145
Subject(s) - particulates , deposition (geology) , aerosol , environmental science , atmospheric sciences , spatial variability , mass concentration (chemistry) , particle size , particle size distribution , spatial distribution , ultrafine particle , environmental chemistry , meteorology , chemistry , geography , materials science , geology , geomorphology , statistics , nanotechnology , remote sensing , mathematics , sediment , organic chemistry
Abstract Human exposure to airborne particulate matter (PM) increases the risk of negative health outcomes; however, substantial uncertainty remains in quantifying these exposure‐response relationships. In particular, relating increased risk of mortality to exposure to PM with diameters smaller than 2.5 μm (PM 2.5 ) neglects variability in the underlying size distribution of PM 2.5 exposure and size‐resolved deposition in human airways. In this study, we combine a size‐resolved respiratory particle‐deposition model with a global size‐resolved aerosol model to estimate the variability in particle deposition along the respiratory tract due to variability in ambient PM size distributions. We find that the ratio of deposited PM mass in the tracheobronchial and alveolar regions per unit ambient PM 2.5 exposure (deposition ratio and DR TB + AV ) varies by 20–30% between populated regions due to variability in ambient PM size distributions. Furthermore, DR TB + AV can vary by as high as a factor of 4 between the fossil‐fuel‐dominated region of the Eastern United States and the desert‐dust‐dominated region of North Africa. When considering individual PM species, such as sulfate or organic matter, we still find variability in the DR TB + AV on the order of 30% due to regional variability in the size distribution. Finally, the spatial distribution of DR TB + AV based on number or surface area is substantially different than the DR TB + AV based on mass. These results suggest that regional variability in ambient aerosol size distributions drive variability in PM deposition in the body, which may lead to variability in the health response from exposure to PM 2.5 .