English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

Multistage hydraulic fracturing is used in horizontal wells to increase the production of tight oil. Fracturing fluids are used in hydraulic fracturing to ensure proppants are suspended, but fluid residuals can cause formation damage and reduce rock permeability; meanwhile, fracture conductivity can be further reduced due to the flowback of proppants during the early stage of production. In this study, steel plates and hydraulically fractured reservoir rocks are tested in a modified API cell to understand the impacts of flowback rate, fracturing fluid, and closure stress on proppant flowback and fracture conductivity. When the closure stress increased from 21 to 30 MPa, retained permeability decreased by slickwater from 35.71 to 29.84% in steel plates; during the flowback, more than 47% of proppants flowed back, and the fracture conductivity increased by 10 times under 21 MPa, which shows the limitation of the API method on the study of proppant flowback. When shale plates are used, the critical flow rate that prevents the proppant flowback was found to be 5.5 × 10 -4 -1.6 × 10 -3 m/s for the 30/50 mesh sands (around 55-340 m 3 /d for a typical horizontal well), and the retained permeability decreased from 23.33 to 22.86% due to an increase of closure stress from 21 to 30 MPa. Results of this study can guide the optimizing of the flowback scheme in the field that minimizes the proppant flowback in different fracturing fluids.

Impacts of Proppant Flowback on Fracture Conductivity in Different Fracturing Fluids and Flowback Conditions