English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

High-resolution air quality (AQ) maps based on street-by-street measurements have become possible through large-scale mobile measurement campaigns. Such campaigns have produced data-only maps and have been used to produce empirical models [i.e., land use regression (LUR) models]. Assuming that all road segments are measured, we developed a mixed model framework that predicts concentrations by an LUR model, while allowing road segments to deviate from the LUR prediction based on between-segment variation as a random effect. We used Google Street View cars, equipped with high-quality AQ instruments, and measured the concentration of NO 2 on every street in Amsterdam ( n = 46.664) and Copenhagen ( n = 28.499) on average seven times over the course of 9 and 16 months, respectively. We compared the data-only mapping, LUR, and mixed model estimates with measurements from passive samplers ( n = 82) and predictions from dispersion models in the same time window as mobile monitoring. In Amsterdam, mixed model estimates correlated r  s (Spearman correlation) = 0.85 with external measurements, whereas the data-only approach and LUR model estimates correlated r  s = 0.74 and 0.75, respectively. Mixed model estimates also correlated higher r  s = 0.65 with the deterministic model predictions compared to the data-only ( r  s = 0.50) and LUR model ( r  s = 0.61). In Copenhagen, mixed model estimates correlated r  s = 0.51 with external model predictions compared to r  s = 0.45 and r  s = 0.50 for data-only and LUR model, respectively. Correlation increased for 97 locations ( r  s = 0.65) with more detailed traffic information. This means that the mixed model approach is able to combine the strength of data-only mapping (to show hyperlocal variation) and LUR models by shrinking uncertain concentrations toward the model output.

environmental science and technology

Mixed-Effects Modeling Framework for Amsterdam and Copenhagen for Outdoor NO<sub>2</sub> Concentrations Using Measurements Sampled with Google Street View Cars

Mixed-Effects Modeling Framework for Amsterdam and Copenhagen for Outdoor NO2 Concentrations Using Measurements Sampled with Google Street View Cars

Mixed-Effects Modeling Framework for Amsterdam and Copenhagen for Outdoor NO₂ Concentrations Using Measurements Sampled with Google Street View Cars