Comparison of Orientation Mapping in SEM and TEM
Author(s) -
Joshua D. Sugar,
Joseph T. McKeown,
Dhego Banga,
Joseph R. Michael
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
microscopy and microanalysis
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.521
H-Index - 69
eISSN - 1435-8115
pISSN - 1431-9276
DOI - 10.1017/s1431927620001671
Subject(s) - materials science , microstructure , transmission electron microscopy , diffraction , scanning electron microscope , orientation (vector space) , nanoscopic scale , electron backscatter diffraction , optics , kikuchi line , electron diffraction , nanotechnology , composite material , reflection high energy electron diffraction , physics , geometry , mathematics
Multiple experimental configurations for performing nanoscale orientation mapping are compared to determine their fidelity to the true microstructure of a sample. Transmission Kikuchi diffraction (TKD) experiments in a scanning electron microscope (SEM) and nanobeam diffraction (NBD) experiments in a transmission electron microscope (TEM) were performed on thin electrodeposited hard Au films with two different microstructures. The Au samples either had a grain size that is >50 or <20 nm. The same regions of the samples were measured with TKD apparatuses at 30 kV in an SEM with detectors in the horizontal and vertical configurations and in the TEM at 300 kV. Under the proper conditions, we demonstrate that all three configurations can produce data of equivalent quality. Each method has strengths and challenges associated with its application and representation of the true microstructure. The conditions needed to obtain high-quality data for each acquisition method and the challenges associated with each are discussed.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom