
Loss of atrial pacing in a patient with a dual‐chamber permanent pacemaker: What is the mechanism?
Author(s) -
Gul Enes Elvin,
Boles Usama,
Ali Fariha Sadiq,
Abdollah Hoshiar
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
journal of arrhythmia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.463
H-Index - 21
eISSN - 1883-2148
pISSN - 1880-4276
DOI - 10.1016/j.joa.2016.08.002
Subject(s) - medicine , cardiology , artificial cardiac pacemaker , lead (geology) , heart block , electrocardiography , geomorphology , geology
1. Atrial oversensing due to lead integrity failure (fracture, insulation failure) or connector problems between the header and the lead. 2. Atrial lead displacement: no evidence of microor macrodisplacement was found on chest radiography. 3. Asynchronous mode of pacing (VOO) due to magnet or programming: device interrogation ruled out this differential diagnosis. The device was fully functional in DDDR mode.