z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Genome-wide Scan of 29,141 African Americans Finds No Evidence of Directional Selection since Admixture
Author(s) -
Gaurav Bhatia,
Arti Tandon,
Nick Patterson,
Melinda C. Aldrich,
Christine B. Ambrosone,
Christopher I. Amos,
Elisa V. Bandera,
Sonja I. Berndt,
Leslie Bernstein,
William J. Blot,
Cathryn H. Bock,
Neil E. Caporaso,
Graham Casey,
Sandra L. Deming,
W. Ryan Diver,
Susan M. Gapstur,
Elizabeth M. Gillanders,
Curtis C. Harris,
Brian E. Henderson,
Sue A. Ingles,
William B. Isaacs,
Phillip L. De Jager,
Esther M. John,
Rick A. Kittles,
Emma K. Larkin,
Lorna H. McNeill,
Robert C. Millikan,
Adam B. Murphy,
Christine NeslundDudas,
Sarah J. Nyante,
Michael F. Press,
Jorge L. RodriguezGil,
Benjamin A. Rybicki,
Ann G. Schwartz,
Lisa B. Signorello,
Margaret Spitz,
Sara S. Strom,
Margaret A. Tucker,
John K. Wiencke,
Esther M. John,
Xifeng Wu,
Yuko Yamamura,
Krista A. Zanetti,
Wei Zheng,
Regina G. Ziegler,
Stephen J. Chanock,
Christopher A. Haiman,
David Reich,
Alkes L. Price
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
the american journal of human genetics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 6.661
H-Index - 302
eISSN - 1537-6605
pISSN - 0002-9297
DOI - 10.1016/j.ajhg.2014.08.011
Subject(s) - selection (genetic algorithm) , genetic genealogy , ancestry informative marker , replicate , allele frequency , biology , genetic admixture , positive selection , allele , african american , evolutionary biology , directional selection , background selection , out of africa , genetics , demography , genetic variation , population , statistics , gene , ethnology , mathematics , history , sociology , computer science , artificial intelligence
The extent of recent selection in admixed populations is currently an unresolved question. We scanned the genomes of 29,141 African Americans and failed to find any genome-wide-significant deviations in local ancestry, indicating no evidence of selection influencing ancestry after admixture. A recent analysis of data from 1,890 African Americans reported that there was evidence of selection in African Americans after their ancestors left Africa, both before and after admixture. Selection after admixture was reported on the basis of deviations in local ancestry, and selection before admixture was reported on the basis of allele-frequency differences between African Americans and African populations. The local-ancestry deviations reported by the previous study did not replicate in our very large sample, and we show that such deviations were expected purely by chance, given the number of hypotheses tested. We further show that the previous study's conclusion of selection in African Americans before admixture is also subject to doubt. This is because the FST statistics they used were inflated and because true signals of unusual allele-frequency differences between African Americans and African populations would be best explained by selection that occurred in Africa prior to migration to the Americas.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom