Porcine versus bovine bioprosthetic valves in mitral position: does choice really matter? | Zendy

Karthik Raman | Zendy; Anbarasu Mohanraj | Zendy; Vijayanand Palanisamy | Zendy; Bharat Kumar Mohandoss | Zendy; Sivakumar Pandian | Zendy; Anjith Prakash Rajakumar | Zendy; Jacob Jamesraj | Zendy; Ejaz Ahmed Sheriff | Zendy; Valikapathalil Mathew Kurian | Zendy; Rajan Sethuratnam | Zendy; Ravi Agarwal | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Open Access

Porcine versus bovine bioprosthetic valves in mitral position: does choice really matter?

Author(s) -

Karthik Raman,

Anbarasu Mohanraj,

Vijayanand Palanisamy,

Bharat Kumar Mohandoss,

Sivakumar Pandian,

Anjith Prakash Rajakumar,

Jacob Jamesraj,

Ejaz Ahmed Sheriff,

Valikapathalil Mathew Kurian,

Rajan Sethuratnam,

Ravi Agarwal

Publication year - 2019

Publication title -

indian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 0.114

H-Index - 9

eISSN - 0973-7723

pISSN - 0970-9134

DOI - 10.1007/s12055-019-00847-6

Subject(s) - medicine , concomitant , cardiac surgery , mitral valve replacement , endocarditis , surgery , mitral valve , infective endocarditis , cardiothoracic surgery , cardiac valve , vascular surgery , cardiology

Bioprosthetic valves are increasingly used for surgical mitral valve replacement (MVR). The long-term outcomes of bovine (BoMVR) vs porcine (PoMVR) remain an enigma regarding the durability. This study aims to examine the outcomes of BoMVR vs PoMVR.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom

About

About Careers Publisher Partners Contact Us Our institutional solutions Get Organisational Trial or Quote

Learn

FAQs Blog Terms of Use Privacy Policy

Download the Zendy App

Discover

Explore

Home ZAIA Blog