z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Is general anaesthesia preferable to conscious sedation in the treatment of acute ischaemic stroke with intra-arterial mechanical thrombectomy? A review of the literature
Author(s) -
Nevin John,
Peter Mitchell,
Richard Dowling,
Bernard Yan
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
neuroradiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.811
H-Index - 94
eISSN - 1432-1920
pISSN - 0028-3940
DOI - 10.1007/s00234-012-1084-y
Subject(s) - medicine , sedation , anesthesia , neuroradiology , airway , general anaesthesia , stroke (engine) , neurology , hemodynamics , neurosurgery , adverse effect , observational study , intensive care medicine , surgery , mechanical engineering , psychiatry , engineering
Intra-arterial mechanical thrombectomy (IAMT) is an endovascular technique that allows for the acute retrieval of intravascular thrombi and is increasingly being used for the treatment of acute ischaemic stroke (AIS). There are currently two anaesthetic options during IAMT: general anaesthesia (GA) and conscious sedation (CS). The decision to use GA versus CS is the source of controversy, as it requires careful balance between patient pain, movement and airway protection whilst minimising time delay and haemodynamic fluctuations. This review examines and summarises the evidence for the use of GA versus CS in the treatment of AIS by IAMT.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom