English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Abstract  A special aspect of parameter identification in finite‐strain elasto‐plasticity is considered. Namely, we analyze the impact of the measurement errors on the resulting set of material parameters. In order to define the sensitivity of parameters with respect to the measurement errors, a mechanics‐based distance between two sets of parameters is introduced. Using this distance function, we assess the reliability of certain parameter identification procedures. The assessment involves introduction of artificial noise to the experimental data; the noise can be both correlated and uncorrelated. An analytical procedure to speed up Monte Carlo simulations is presented. As a result, a simple tool for estimating the robustness of parameter identification is obtained. The efficiency of the approach is illustrated using a model of finite‐strain viscoplasticity, which accounts for combined isotropic and kinematic hardening. It is shown that dealing with correlated measurement errors, most stable identification results are obtained for non‐diagonal weighting matrix. At the same time, there is a conflict between the stability and accuracy.

Parameter identification in elasto‐plasticity: distance between parameters and impact of measurement errors