z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell‐Derived Mesenchymal Stromal Cells Are Functionally and Genetically Different From Bone Marrow‐Derived Mesenchymal Stromal Cells
Author(s) -
Xu Maojia,
Shaw Georgina,
Murphy Mary,
Barry Frank
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
stem cells
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.159
H-Index - 229
eISSN - 1549-4918
pISSN - 1066-5099
DOI - 10.1002/stem.2993
Subject(s) - mesenchymal stem cell , cd90 , biology , induced pluripotent stem cell , progenitor cell , stromal cell , stem cell , bone marrow , microbiology and biotechnology , adipogenesis , chondrogenesis , cellular differentiation , cancer research , immunology , cd34 , embryonic stem cell , genetics , gene
There has been considerable interest in the generation of functional mesenchymal stromal cell (MSC) preparations from induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) and this is now regarded as a potential source of unlimited, standardized, high‐quality cells for therapeutic applications in regenerative medicine. Although iMSCs meet minimal criteria for defining MSCs in terms of marker expression, there are substantial differences in terms of trilineage potential, specifically a marked reduction in chondrogenic and adipogenic propensity in iMSCs compared with bone marrow‐derived (BM) MSCs. To reveal the cellular basis underlying these differences, we conducted phenotypic, functional, and genetic comparisons between iMSCs and BM‐MSCs. We found that iMSCs express very high levels of both KDR and MSX2 compared with BM‐MSCs. In addition, BM‐MSCs had significantly higher levels of PDGFRα . These distinct gene expression profiles were maintained during culture expansion, suggesting that prepared iMSCs are more closely related to vascular progenitor cells (VPCs). Although VPCs can differentiate along the chondrogenic, osteogenic, and adipogenic pathways, they require different inductive conditions compared with BM‐MSCs. These observations suggest to us that iMSCs, based on current widely used preparation protocols, do not represent a true alternative to primary MSCs isolated from BM. Furthermore, this study highlights the fact that high levels of expression of typical MSC markers such as CD73, CD90, and CD105 are insufficient to distinguish MSCs from other mesodermal progenitors in differentiated induced pluripotent stem cell cultures. Stem Cells 2019;37:754–765

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here