z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
A survey of characteristics and current educational needs of hemophilia treatment centers within Asia Pacific
Author(s) -
Lam Joyce C. M.,
John M. Joseph,
Street Alison
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2475-0379
DOI - 10.1002/rth2.12108
Subject(s) - medicine , asia pacific , family medicine , directory , health care , quality (philosophy) , business , economic growth , international trade , computer science , economics , operating system , philosophy , epistemology
Background Poor disease understanding and gaps in expertise regarding hemophilia care have been identified at all levels in Asia Pacific. Continued education for involved healthcare professionals ( HCP s) is crucial for improved delivery. Objectives To identify training and educational needs of hemophilia HCP s in Asia Pacific. Methods Clinicians working at hemophilia treatment centers ( HTC s), identified from the World Federation of Hemophilia Directory, were contacted by the Asia Pacific Hemophilia Working Group ( APHWG ). An electronic survey was sent to 161 centers from 15 countries for which HTC identification was complete to assess HTC characteristics, educational status, and needs. Responses were stratified by national economic capacity. Results From March 23 to June 6, 2016, clinicians from 58 HTC s completed the survey. Most reported availability of specialists to serve core patient requirements, although availability of trained nurses and geneticists was low in lower‐middle income countries ( LMIC s). Although 98.3% of HTC s had laboratory facilities, 8.8% do not participate in any quality assessment schemes. The most common limitations of current initiatives were infrequency and lack of local language content. Education is currently mostly received via internet, particularly among LMIC s and upper‐middle income countries ( UMIC s), though there is strong preference for meetings. Main barriers to receiving education were funding and time constraints. Unique priority topics were musculoskeletal management, quality of life and management by non‐hematologists (high‐income countries), inhibitor management and research ( UMIC s), and outcomes assessment ( LMIC s). Conclusion In Asia Pacific, training programs should be tailored according to unique needs of differing economic capacities and resource settings.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here