z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Sperm cryopreservation: Clinical and fertility outcomes in male oncological patients with germ cell tumors or hematological disorders
Author(s) -
Negoro Hiromitsu,
Matsui Yoshiyuki,
Nakayama Takahiro,
Hatayama Hiroshi,
Ogawa Osamu,
Ichioka Kentaro
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
reproductive medicine and biology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.005
H-Index - 22
eISSN - 1447-0578
pISSN - 1445-5781
DOI - 10.1002/rmb2.12246
Subject(s) - cryopreservation , medicine , semen cryopreservation , germ cell tumors , sperm bank , fertility preservation , sperm , fertility , semen quality , semen , gynecology , sperm motility , chemotherapy , andrology , biology , embryo , population , environmental health , microbiology and biotechnology
Purpose There is insufficient understanding of the effects of malignant diseases themselves and chemotherapy on semen quality and final fertility outcomes. Here, the authors focused on the patients with malignant diseases who cryopreserved sperm pre‐ or post‐chemotherapy for future fertility, and revealed how clinical settings can affect semen quality and final outcomes. Methods The authors reviewed the records of 257 patients with malignant diseases who cryopreserved sperm. Among 257 cases, 113 men with germ cell tumors (GCTs) and 111 men with hematological disorders (HDs) were included in this study. Twenty‐five patients who achieved successful outcomes using cryopreserved sperm were also analyzed. Results In the men with GCTs and HDs, respectively, differences were observed in age (28 vs 27 years), sperm concentration (32.6 vs 46.1 million/mL, P  < 0.05), motility (42.2% vs 41.0%), and the rate of cryopreservation before chemotherapy (90% vs 59%, P  < 0.0001). For successful pregnancies and deliveries, age at cryopreservation (30.0 vs 35.3 years, P  < 0.05) and disease type (12/16 vs 3/9, P  < 0.05) were significant factors. Conclusions Compared to patients with GCTs, those with HDs have a lower pregnancy and delivery rate, even though semen quality is higher. Disease type and age at cryopreservation are significant factors for successful outcomes.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here