English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

In this contribution, we review in a rigorous, yet comprehensive fashion the assessment of the one‐body reduced density matrices derived from the most used single‐reference excited‐state calculation methods in the framework of the equation‐of‐motion formalism. Those methods are separated into two types: those which involve the coupling of a deexcitation operator to a single‐excitation transition operator, and those which do not involve such a coupling. The case of many‐body auxiliary wave functions for excited states is also addressed. For each of these approaches we were interested in deriving the elements of the one‐body transition and difference density matrices, and to highlight their particular structure. This has been accomplished by applying a decomposition of integrals involving one‐determinant quantum electronic states on which two or three pairs of second quantization operators can act. Such a decomposition has been done according to a corollary to Wick's theorem, which is brought in a comprehensive and detailed manner. A comment is also given about the consequences of using the equation‐of‐motion formulation in this context, and the two types of excited‐state calculation methods (with and without coupling excitations to deexcitations) are finally compared from the point of view of the structure of their transition and difference density matrices.

international journal of quantum chemistry

A comprehensive, self‐contained derivation of the one‐body density matrices from single‐reference excited‐state calculation methods using the equation‐of‐motion formalism