English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Density‐functional based tight‐binding (DFTB) is a powerful method to describe large molecules and materials. Metal‐organic frameworks (MOFs), materials with interesting catalytic properties and with very large surface areas, have been developed and have become commercially available. Unit cells of MOFs typically include hundreds of atoms, which make the application of standard density‐functional methods computationally very expensive, sometimes even unfeasible. The aim of this paper is to prepare and to validate the self‐consistent charge‐DFTB (SCC‐DFTB) method for MOFs containing Cu, Zn, and Al metal centers. The method has been validated against full hybrid density‐functional calculations for model clusters, against gradient corrected density‐functional calculations for supercells, and against experiment. Moreover, the modular concept of MOF chemistry has been discussed on the basis of their electronic properties. We concentrate on MOFs comprising three common connector units: copper paddlewheels (HKUST‐1), zinc oxide Zn 4 O tetrahedron (MOF‐5, MOF‐177, DUT‐6 (MOF‐205)), and aluminum oxide AlO 4 (OH) 2  octahedron (MIL‐53). We show that SCC‐DFTB predicts structural parameters with a very good accuracy (with less than 5% deviation, even for adsorbed CO and H 2 O on HKUST‐1), while adsorption energies differ by 12 kJ mol −1  or less for CO and water compared to DFT benchmark calculations.

Structural properties of metal‐organic frameworks within the density‐functional based tight‐binding method