z-logo
Premium
iTRAQ as a method for optimization: Enhancing peptide recovery after gel fractionation
Author(s) -
Glibert Pieter,
Steendam Katleen,
Dhaenens Maarten,
Deforce Dieter
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
proteomics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.26
H-Index - 167
eISSN - 1615-9861
pISSN - 1615-9853
DOI - 10.1002/pmic.201300444
Subject(s) - fractionation , peptide , chromatography , chemistry , computational biology , biochemistry , biology
At the dawn of a new era in label‐free quantitation on high‐resolution MS instruments, classical methods such as iTRAQ continue to provide very useful insights in comparative proteomics. The potential to multiplex samples makes this reporter‐based labeling technique highly suited for method optimization as demonstrated here by a set of standard series. Instead of studying ratios of annotated proteins, we propose an alternative method, based on the analysis of the average reporter ratios of all the spectra from a sample or a large distinct subset herein. This strategy circumvents the bias, associated with the annotation and iTRAQ quantitation, leading to increased adequacy in measuring yield differences between workflows. As gel electrophoresis prior to MS analysis is highly beneficial, for example, as a fractionation step, the approach was applied to evaluate the influence of several parameters of the established in‐gel digestion protocol. We quantified the negative effect of SYPRO Ruby staining and the positive effect of gel fixation prior to digestion on peptide yield. Finally, we emphasize the benefits of adding CaCl 2 and ACN to a tryptic in‐gel digest, resulting in an up to tenfold enhanced peptide recovery and fewer trypsin missed cleavages.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here