Open AccessExecutive function in individuals with clinically significant weight loss via behavioral intervention
Author(s) -
Gowey Marissa A.,
Neumeier William H.,
Henry Samantha,
Wadley Virginia G.,
Phillips Janice,
Hayden Kathleen M.,
Espeland Mark A.,
Coday Mace,
Lewis Cora E.,
Dutton Gareth R.
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
obesity science and practice
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.654
H-Index - 14
ISSN - 2055-2238
DOI - 10.1002/osp4.458
Subject(s) - weight loss , medicine , obesity , cognitive flexibility , depression (economics) , weight management , gerontology , body mass index , demography , cognition , clinical psychology , psychiatry , sociology , economics , macroeconomics
Background Executive function (EF) is associated with obesity development and self‐management. Individuals who demonstrate or self‐report poorer EF performance tend to have poorer short‐term outcomes in obesity treatment. There may be distinct behavioral self‐management strategies and EF domains related to initial weight loss as compared to weight loss maintenance. Objective To characterize EF in individuals who achieved clinically significant weight loss via behavioral intervention and examine potential differences in EF between those who maintained versus regained lost weight. Methods Participants who previously achieved ≥5% weight loss via lifestyle intervention were included ( N = 44). “Maintainers” ( n = 16) maintained this minimum level of weight loss for ≥1 year. “Regainers” ( n = 28) regained some or all initially lost weight. Performance‐based EF, intelligence quotient, health literacy, depression, anxiety, binge eating, demographics, and medical/weight history were assessed using a cross‐sectional design. Descriptive statistics and age‐, gender‐, education‐adjusted reference ranges were used to characterize EF. Analyses of covariance were conducted to examine EF differences between maintainers and regainers. Results The sample consisted primarily of females with obesity over age 50. Approximately half self‐identified as African–American. Decision‐making performance was better in maintainers than regainers ( p = 0.003, part η 2 = 0.19). There were no differences between maintainers and regainers in inhibitory control, verbal fluency, planning/organization, cognitive flexibility, or working memory ( p s > 0.05, part η 2 s = 0.003–0.07). At least 75% of the sample demonstrated average‐above average EF test performance, indicated by scaled scores ≥13 or t‐scores > 60. Conclusions Most individuals with obesity who achieved clinically significant weight loss via behavioral intervention had average to above average EF. Individuals who maintained (vs. regained) their lost weight performed better on tests of decision‐making.