Premium
Field drift correction of proton resonance frequency shift temperature mapping with multichannel fast alternating nonselective free induction decay readouts
Author(s) -
Ferrer Cyril J.,
Bartels Lambertus W.,
Velden Tijl A.,
Grüll Holger,
Heijman Edwin,
Moonen Chrit T. W.,
Bos Clemens
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
magnetic resonance in medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.696
H-Index - 225
eISSN - 1522-2594
pISSN - 0740-3194
DOI - 10.1002/mrm.27985
Subject(s) - imaging phantom , nuclear magnetic resonance , free induction decay , electromagnetic coil , proton , chemistry , sensitivity (control systems) , intensity (physics) , physics , nuclear medicine , optics , analytical chemistry (journal) , magnetic resonance imaging , nuclear physics , spin echo , medicine , chromatography , quantum mechanics , electronic engineering , radiology , engineering
Purpose To demonstrate that proton resonance frequency shift MR thermometry (PRFS‐MRT) acquisition with nonselective free induction decay (FID), combined with coil sensitivity profiles, allows spatially resolved B 0 drift‐corrected thermometry. Methods Phantom experiments were performed at 1.5T and 3T. Acquisition of PRFS‐MRT and FID were performed during MR‐guided high‐intensity focused ultrasound heating. The phase of the FIDs was used to estimate the change in angular frequency δω drift per coil element. Two correction methods were investigated: (1) using the average δω drift over all coil elements (0th‐order) and (2) using coil sensitivity profiles for spatially resolved correction. Optical probes were used for independent temperature verification. In‐vivo feasibility of the methods was evaluated in the leg of 1 healthy volunteer at 1.5T. Results In 30 minutes, B 0 drift led to an apparent temperature change of up to –18°C and –98°C at 1.5T and 3T, respectively. In the sonicated area, both corrections had a median error of 0.19°C at 1.5T and –0.54°C at 3T. At 1.5T, the measured median error with respect to the optical probe was –1.28°C with the 0th‐order correction and improved to 0.43°C with the spatially resolved correction. In vivo, without correction the spatiotemporal median of the apparent temperature was at –4.3°C and interquartile range (IQR) of 9.31°C. The 0th‐order correction had a median of 0.75°C and IQR of 0.96°C. The spatially resolved method had the lowest median at 0.33°C and IQR of 0.80°C. Conclusion FID phase information from individual receive coil elements allows spatially resolved B 0 drift correction in PRFS‐based MRT.