English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

Background  Autologous fat grafting (AFG) is evolving in both aesthetic and reconstructive applications, since the body of evidence for its use has expanded. The earliest controversies were evident in lipofilling for oncological breast reconstruction, and to this day, some countries do not allow it for fear of inducing tumourigenesis in an oncologically ablated field.    Methods  We sought to review contemporary harvesting and processing techniques for  AFG  in the craniofacial region, therefore distributed a survey to evaluate the clinical impact of oncological risk across four European countries.    Results  We found no significant geographical differences between the German‐speaking and the English groups concerning their harvesting and processing technique. Half of our respondents discuss the possibility of pro‐oncologic behavior of  AFG .    Conclusion   AFG  harvesting and processing techniques do not considerably vary by geography. Further studies should evaluate oncologic risk potential of  AFG  in head and neck tumor sites, especially because there is no excellent article regarding this phenomenon.  Level of Evidence: V

laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology

Autologous fat grafting in the face and  neck: Multinational  trends and knowledge of the safety, applications, and indications considering oncologic risk potential