Open AccessQuality of life outcomes in transcatheter aortic valve replacement patients requiring pacemaker implantation
Author(s) -
Bhardwaj Aishwarya,
Ramanan Tharmathai,
Sawant Abhishek C.,
Sinibaldi Everett,
Pham Michael,
Khan Sahoor,
Qureshi Reema,
Agrawal Nikhil,
Khalil Charl,
Hansen Rosemary,
Baldo Shan,
Colern Gerald,
Corbelli John,
Pershad Ashish,
Beck Hiroko,
Iyer Vijay
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
journal of arrhythmia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.463
H-Index - 21
eISSN - 1883-2148
pISSN - 1880-4276
DOI - 10.1002/joa3.12065
Subject(s) - medicine , permanent pacemaker , valve replacement , quality of life (healthcare) , cardiology , confidence interval , complication , surgery , stenosis , nursing
Abstract Background Permanent pacemaker implantation is the most common complication after Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and is associated with worse outcomes and mortality. However, its impact on quality‐of‐life (QoL) outcomes remains unknown. Methods We included 383 consecutive patients undergoing TAVR from January 2012 to 2016 who completed a baseline Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ‐12) health survey. The clinical, laboratory, angiographic, QoL, mortality, and occurrence of poor outcomes (KCCQ‐12 score < 45 or KCCQ decrease of ≥10 points) were obtained. Results The mean age was 83 ± 8 years, 51% were men, and majority were Caucasians (n = 364, 95%). Permanent pacemaker (PPM) was implanted in 11.5% of patients post‐TAVR. PPM patients were more likely to have prior conduction disease including RBBB (25% vs 12%, P = .02) and PQ interval >250 ms (11% vs 5%, P = .07). One‐month median KCCQ‐12 scores were significantly lower among PPM patients (84.7 vs 68.8, P = .04), but did not differ significantly at 1‐year (86.5 vs 90.6, P = .5) post‐TAVR. Occurrence of poor outcomes did not differ significantly among those with or without PPM at 1 month (11% vs 7%, P = .39) and 1 year (13% vs 9%, P = .45), respectively. However, patients with poor QoL outcomes at 1 month post‐TAVR also had significantly worse mortality during follow‐up in unadjusted (31.3% vs 4.5%, P < .001) and adjusted (HR = 5.30, 95% [CI: 1.85‐15.22, P = .002])analyses, respectively. Conclusion Permanent pacemaker implantation is associated with short‐term reduction in QoL without long‐term implications post‐TAVR. Patients with poor QoL post‐TAVR also have significantly higher mortality.