
Electrical remodelling and response following cardiac resynchronization therapy: A novel analysis of intracardiac electrogram using a quadripolar lead
Author(s) -
Toner Liam,
Flannery Darragh,
Sugumar Hariharan,
Ord Michelle,
Lin Tina,
O'Donnell David
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
journal of arrhythmia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.463
H-Index - 21
eISSN - 1883-2148
pISSN - 1880-4276
DOI - 10.1002/joa3.12063
Subject(s) - medicine , cardiac resynchronization therapy , intracardiac injection , cardiology , lead (geology) , heart failure , ejection fraction , geomorphology , geology
Background Cardiac resynchronization therapy ( CRT ) improves morbidity and mortality in patients with heart failure. Although structural remodelling correlates with improved long‐term outcomes, the role of electrical remodelling is poorly understood. This study aimed to evaluate electrical remodelling following CRT using a quadripolar left ventricular ( LV ) lead and to correlate this with structural remodelling. Methods Consecutive patients undergoing initial CRT implantation using a quadripolar LV lead were enrolled. Patients were followed up for 12 months. Twelve lead ECG , transthoracic echocardiogram, and evaluation of intracardiac electrograms ( EGM ) were performed. Measures included right and left ventricular lead intrinsic delay, RV ‐pacing to LV ‐sensing ( RV p‐ LV s) delay, and LV ‐pacing to RV ‐sensing ( LV p‐ RV s) delay. The electrical changes were then correlated with echocardiographic response to CRT , defined by ≥15% relative reduction in LVESV and ≥ 5% absolute improvement in EF on TTE . Activation sequence was determined using the quadripolar lead. Results Forty patients were enrolled. Mean intrinsic RV ‐ LV EGM values decreased from 121.9 ± 14.7 ms to 109.1 ± 15.0 ms ( P < .01), mean RV p‐ LV s EGM values from 146.7 ± 16.7 ms to 135.1 ± 13.1 ms, ( P < .01), and mean LV p‐ RV s EGM values from 155.7 ± 18.1 ms to 144.2 ± 17.1 ms ( P < .01). The improvement in intrinsic RV ‐ LV EGM was 14.9 ± 8.5 ms in responders vs 8.9 ± 7.9 ms in nonresponders to CRT ( P < .05). Changes in activation sequence did not correlate with CRT response. Conclusions This novel study used EGM s from a quadripolar LV lead to demonstrate electrical remodelling occurs following CRT . A nonsignificant trend suggests that electrical remodelling in CRT is greater in responders compared to nonresponders, although further study is needed.