English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

Patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices ( CIED ) and endovascular infection represent a difficult management group. The explantation of an implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator ( ICD ) system deprives the patient of the protection against life‐threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmias. In this study, we describe feasibility and clinical outcomes of bridging with temporary dual‐coil  ICD  lead and external  ICD  following the extraction of a  CIED  due to endovascular infection and compare the performance of this approach to other available options.

Temporary external implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator as a bridge to reimplantation after infected device extraction