Premium
Laparotomic versus robotic surgery in elderly patients with endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
Author(s) -
Raffone Antonio,
Travaglino Antonio,
Raimondo Diego,
Boccia Dominga,
Vetrella Martino,
Verrazzo Paolo,
Granata Marcello,
Casadio Paolo,
Insabato Luigi,
Mollo Antonio,
Seracchioli Renato
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
international journal of gynecology and obstetrics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.895
H-Index - 97
eISSN - 1879-3479
pISSN - 0020-7292
DOI - 10.1002/ijgo.13766
Subject(s) - medicine , robotic surgery , relative risk , meta analysis , surgery , endometrial cancer , subgroup analysis , confidence interval , cancer
Background Although robotics has been shown to improve outcomes in some high‐difficulty surgical category patients, it is unclear if such an approach may improve outcomes in elderly patients with endometrial carcinoma (EC). Objective To compare robotic and laparotomic surgery in the treatment and staging of elderly EC patients. Materials and methods A systematic review and meta‐analysis was performed assessing the risk of overall, intra‐operative, and peri‐operative complications associated with the surgical approach (laparotomic vs robotic) for elderly patients with EC by relative risk (RR). Pooled means ± standard deviation of length of stay were compared with the unpaired t test. Subgroup analyses for overall complications were performed based on different age cut‐offs (>70, >65, and >75 years) and severity of complications (minor and major). A value of P less than 0.05 was considered significant. Results Five studies with 7629 EC patients were included. Pooled RR for robotic compared with laparotomic surgery was 0.40 ( P < 0.001) for overall, 0.46 ( P = 0.18) for intra‐operative, and 0.43 ( P < 0.001) for peri‐operative complications. Pooled difference between means ± standard deviation of length of stay for robotic versus laparotomic surgery was −3.34 ( P < 0.001). At subgroup analyses, pooled RR of overall complications for robotic surgery versus laparotomic surgery was 0.34 ( P < 0.001) in the >70 years, 0.51 ( P < 0.01) in the >65 years, 0.20 ( P = 0.12) in the >75 years groups. Pooled RR was 0.50 ( P = 0.1) in the minor complications subgroup, and 0.42 ( P = 0.002) in the major complications subgroup. Conclusion Robotics might be a viable alternative to the laparotomic approach for EC in elderly patients because it significantly decreases the risk of overall and peri‐operative complications (mainly major complications), and the length of stay when compared with laparotomy. The decrease in risk of overall complications is greater with increasing patient age.