Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying motor feature binding processes and representations

Coherent, voluntary action requires an integrated representation of these actions and their defining features. Although theories delineate how action integration requiring binding between different action features may be accomplished, the underlying neurophysiological mechanisms are largely elusive. The present study examined the neurophysiological mechanisms underlying binding processes in actions. To this end, we conducted EEG recordings and applied standard event‐related potential analyses, temporal EEG signal decomposition and multivariate pattern analyses (MVPA). According to the code occupation account, an overlap between a planned and a to‐be‐performed action impairs performance. The level, to which performance is attenuated depends on the strength of binding of action features. This binding process then determines the representation of them, the so‐called action files. We show that code occupation and bindings between action features specifically modulate processes preceding motor execution as showed by the stimulus‐locked lateralized readiness potential (LRP). Conversely, motor execution processes reflected by the response‐locked LRP were not modulated by action file binding. The temporal decomposition of the EEG signal, further distinguished between action file related processes: the planned response determining code occupation was reflected in general (voluntary) response selection but not in involuntary (response priming‐related) activation. Moreover, MVPA on temporally decomposed neural signals indicated that action files are represented as a continuous chain of activations. Within this chain, inhibitory and response re‐activation patterns can be distinguished. Taken together, the neurophysiological correlates of action file binding suggest that parallel, stimulus‐ and response‐related pre‐motor processes are responsible for the code occupation in the human motor system.