z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Deep learning‐guided joint attenuation and scatter correction in multitracer neuroimaging studies
Author(s) -
Arabi Hossein,
Bortolin Karin,
Ginovart Nathalie,
Garibotto Valentina,
Zaidi Habib
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
human brain mapping
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.005
H-Index - 191
eISSN - 1097-0193
pISSN - 1065-9471
DOI - 10.1002/hbm.25039
Subject(s) - correction for attenuation , positron emission tomography , nuclear medicine , attenuation , neuroimaging , artificial intelligence , convolutional neural network , pet imaging , computer science , medicine , physics , optics , psychiatry
PET attenuation correction (AC) on systems lacking CT/transmission scanning, such as dedicated brain PET scanners and hybrid PET/MRI, is challenging. Direct AC in image‐space, wherein PET images corrected for attenuation and scatter are synthesized from nonattenuation corrected PET (PET‐nonAC) images in an end‐to‐end fashion using deep learning approaches (DLAC) is evaluated for various radiotracers used in molecular neuroimaging studies. One hundred eighty brain PET scans acquired using 18 F‐FDG, 18 F‐DOPA, 18 F‐Flortaucipir (targeting tau pathology), and 18 F‐Flutemetamol (targeting amyloid pathology) radiotracers (40 + 5, training/validation + external test, subjects for each radiotracer) were included. The PET data were reconstructed using CT‐based AC (CTAC) to generate reference PET‐CTAC and without AC to produce PET‐nonAC images. A deep convolutional neural network was trained to generate PET attenuation corrected images (PET‐DLAC) from PET‐nonAC. The quantitative accuracy of this approach was investigated separately for each radiotracer considering the values obtained from PET‐CTAC images as reference. A segmented AC map (PET‐SegAC) containing soft‐tissue and background air was also included in the evaluation. Quantitative analysis of PET images demonstrated superior performance of the DLAC approach compared to SegAC technique for all tracers. Despite the relatively low quantitative bias observed when using the DLAC approach, this approach appears vulnerable to outliers, resulting in noticeable local pseudo uptake and false cold regions. Direct AC in image‐space using deep learning demonstrated quantitatively acceptable performance with less than 9% absolute SUV bias for the four different investigated neuroimaging radiotracers. However, this approach is vulnerable to outliers which result in large local quantitative bias.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here