English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Summary  Both compressible and incompressible Navier‐Stokes solvers can be used and are used to solve incompressible turbulent flow problems. In the compressible case, the Mach number is then considered as a solver parameter that is set to a small value, M ≈0.1, in order to mimic incompressible flows. This strategy is widely used for high‐order discontinuous Galerkin (DG) discretizations of the compressible Navier‐Stokes equations. The present work raises the question regarding the computational efficiency of compressible DG solvers as compared to an incompressible formulation. Our contributions to the state of the art are twofold: Firstly, we present a high‐performance DG solver for the compressible Navier‐Stokes equations based on a highly efficient matrix‐free implementation that targets modern cache‐based multicore architectures with Flop/Byte ratios significantly larger than 1. The performance results presented in this work focus on the node‐level performance, and our results suggest that there is great potential for further performance improvements for current state‐of‐the‐art DG implementations of the compressible Navier‐Stokes equations. Secondly, this compressible Navier‐Stokes solver is put into perspective by comparing it to an incompressible DG solver that uses the same matrix‐free implementation. We discuss algorithmic differences between both solution strategies and present an in‐depth numerical investigation of the performance. The considered benchmark test cases are the three‐dimensional Taylor‐Green vortex problem as a representative of transitional flows and the turbulent channel flow problem as a representative of wall‐bounded turbulent flows. The results indicate a clear performance advantage of the incompressible formulation over the compressible one.

international journal for numerical methods in fluids

A matrix‐free high‐order discontinuous Galerkin compressible Navier‐Stokes solver: A performance comparison of compressible and incompressible formulations for turbulent incompressible flows