English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Summary  Uncertainty quantification (UQ) is receiving more and more attention for engineering applications particularly from robust optimization. Indeed, running a computer experiment only provides a limited knowledge in terms of uncertainty and variability of the input parameters. These experiments are often computationally expensive, and surrogate models can be constructed to address this issue. The outcome of an uncertainty quantification study is, in this case, directly correlated to the surrogate's quality. Thus, attention must be devoted to the design of experiments to retrieve as much information as possible. This work presents 2 new strategies for parameter space resampling to improve a Gaussian process surrogate model. These techniques indeed show an improvement of the predictive quality of the model with high‐dimensional analytical input functions. Finally, the methods are successfully applied to a turbine blade large‐eddy simulation application: the aerothermal flow around the  LS89  blade cascade.

Resampling strategies to improve surrogate model‐based uncertainty quantification: Application to LES of LS89