English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

Abstract   Aims  Contrast‐induced nephropathy remains a common complication of coronary procedure and increases poor outcomes, especially in patients with heart failure. Plasma volume expansion relates to worsening prognosis of heart failure. We hypothesized that calculated plasma volume status (PVS) might provide predictive utility for contrast‐induced nephropathy in patients with heart failure undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).    Methods and results  We enrolled 441 patients with heart failure undergoing elective PCI from 2012 to 2018. Pre‐procedural estimated PVS by the Duarte's formula (Duarte‐ePVS) and Kaplan–Hakim formula (KH‐ePVS) were calculated for all patients. CIN was defined as an absolute serum creatinine (SCr) increase ≥0.5 mg/dL or a relative increase ≥25% compared with the baseline value within 48 h of contrast medium exposure. We assessed the association between PVS and CIN in patients with heart failure undergoing elective PCI. In 441 patients, 28 (6.3%) patients developed CIN. The median Duarte‐ePVS was 4.44 (3.87, 5.13) and the median KH‐ePVS was −0.03 (−0.09, 0.05). The best cutoff values for Duarte‐ePVS and KH‐ePVS to predict CIN were 4.64 (with 78.6% sensitivity and 61.7% specificity) and 0.04 (with 64.5% sensitivity and 75.5% specificity), respectively. After adjusting for potential confounding variables, KH‐ePVS &gt; 0.04 [odds ratio (OR) 2.685, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.012–7.123,  P  = 0.047] remained significantly associated with CIN whereas Duarte‐ePVS was not.    Conclusions  Pre‐procedural KH‐ePVS is an independent risk factor for CIN in patients with heart failure undergoing elective PCI. The best cutoff point of KH‐ePVS for predicting CIN was 0.04.

Predictive value of plasma volume status for contrast‐induced nephropathy in patients with heart failure undergoing PCI