z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Sex differences in patients with cardiogenic shock
Author(s) -
Yan Isabell,
Schrage Benedikt,
Weimann Jessica,
Dabboura Salim,
Hilal Rafel,
Beer Benedikt N.,
Becher Peter Moritz,
Seiffert Moritz,
Magnussen Christina,
B. Schnabel Renate,
Kirchhof Paulus,
Blankenberg Stefan,
Westermann Dirk
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
esc heart failure
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.787
H-Index - 25
ISSN - 2055-5822
DOI - 10.1002/ehf2.13303
Subject(s) - medicine , interquartile range , cardiogenic shock , hazard ratio , confidence interval , odds ratio , confounding , logistic regression , presentation (obstetrics) , proportional hazards model , cohort , surgery , myocardial infarction
Aims Differences between female and male patients in clinical presentation, causes and treatment of cardiogenic shock (CS) are poorly understood. We aimed to investigate sex differences in presentation with and treatment of CS. Methods and results We analysed data of 978 patients presenting with CS to a tertiary care hospital between October 2009 and October 2017. Multivariable adjusted logistic/Cox regression models were fitted to investigate the association between sex and clinical presentation, use of treatments and 30 day mortality. Median age was 70 years (interquartile range 58–79 years), and 295 (30.2%) patients were female. After adjustment for multiple relevant confounders, female patients were more likely to be older [odds ratio (OR) 1.21, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02–1.42, P  = 0.027], but other relevant presentation characteristics did not differ between both sexes. Despite the similar presentation, female patients were less likely to be treated with percutaneous left ventricular assist devices (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.64–0.94, P  = 0.010), but more likely to be treated with catecholamines (OR 1.21, 95% CI 1.02–1.44, P  = 0.033) or vasopressors (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.05–1.50, P  = 0.012). A 30 day mortality risk in female patients was as high as in male patients (hazard ratio 1.08, 95% CI 1.00–1.18, P  = 0.091). Conclusions In this large, contemporary cohort, clinical presentation was comparable in female and male patients, and both sexes were associated with a comparably high mortality risk. Nevertheless, female patients received different treatment for CS and were most importantly less likely to be treated with percutaneous left ventricular assist devices.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here