Premium
The diagnostic and prognostic role of flow cytometry in idiopathic and clonal cytopenia of undetermined significance (ICUS/CCUS): A single‐center analysis of 79 patients
Author(s) -
Dimopoulos Konstantinos,
Hansen Olga Kristina,
Sjö Lene Dissing,
Saft Leonie,
Schjødt Ida Marianne,
Werner Hansen Jakob,
Grønbæk Kirsten
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
cytometry part b: clinical cytometry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.646
H-Index - 61
eISSN - 1552-4957
pISSN - 1552-4949
DOI - 10.1002/cyto.b.21842
Subject(s) - medicine , cytopenia , myelodysplastic syndromes , retrospective cohort study , myeloid leukemia , dysplasia , cohort , clinical significance , intensive care , chronic myelomonocytic leukemia , oncology , bone marrow , intensive care medicine
Abstract Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic and prognostic role of multiparameter flow cytometry (FC) in patients with idiopathic cytopenia of undetermined significance (ICUS) and clonal cytopenia of undetermined significance (CCUS). Methods We performed FC using a standardized panel and two different diagnostic algorithms (Ogata, Wells) in a well‐characterized cohort of 79 patients with ICUS/CCUS and compared it with a retrospective blinded morphological evaluation and data from targeted next‐generation DNA sequencing of 20 myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS)‐related genes. Results Our data show that FC has low sensitivity in distinguishing CCUS from ICUS patients (40.5% for Ogata score and 59.5% for Wells score). The Wells score was suggestive of dysplasia in ICUS/CCUS patients with concurrent morphological signs of dysplasia in the bone marrow (following re‐evaluation by two hematopathologists) and in CCUS patients with a higher mutational burden. Eight patients with ICUS/CCUS from our cohort progressed to another myeloid malignancy (MDS, acute myeloid leukemia, or chronic myelomonocytic leukemia), all showing flow cytometric signs of dysplasia. Conclusion FC performs poorly in diagnosing CCUS versus ICUS. However, it can potentially provide prognostic information in cytopenic patients by identifying a subgroup of patients with a higher grade of dysplasia, higher mutational burden, and higher risk of progression and, together with mutational screening, also identify a group of patients who might require morphological reassessment of dysplastic changes in their bone marrow.