z-logo
Premium
Flow cytometry shows added value in diagnosing lymphoma in brain biopsies
Author(s) -
van der Meulen Matthijs,
Bromberg Jacoline E.C.,
Lam King H.,
Dammers Ruben,
Langerak Anton W.,
Doorduijn Jeanette K.,
Kros Johan M.,
van den Bent Martin J.,
van der Velden Vincent H.J.
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
cytometry part b: clinical cytometry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.646
H-Index - 61
eISSN - 1552-4957
pISSN - 1552-4949
DOI - 10.1002/cyto.b.21641
Subject(s) - flow cytometry , immunohistochemistry , pathology , histology , lymphoma , medicine , cytometry , biopsy , gold standard (test) , immunology
Background To assess the sensitivity, specificity and turnaround time of flow cytometric analysis on brain biopsies compared to histology plus immunohistochemistry analysis in tumors with clinical suspicion of lymphoma. Methods All brain biopsies performed between 2010 and 2015 at our institution and analyzed by both immunohistochemistry and flow cytometry were included in this retrospective study. Immunohistochemistry was considered the gold standard. Results In a total of 77 biopsies from 71 patients, 49 lymphomas were diagnosed by immunohistochemistry, flow cytometry results were concordant in 71 biopsies (92.2%). We found a specificity and sensitivity of flow cytometry of 100% and 87.8%, respectively. The time between the biopsy and reporting the result (turnaround time) was significantly shorter for flow cytometry, compared to immunohistochemistry (median: 1 vs. 5 days). Conclusions Flow cytometry has a high specificity and can confirm the diagnosis of a lymphoma significantly faster than immunohistochemistry. This allows for rapid initiation of treatment in this highly aggressive tumor. However, since its sensitivity is less than 100%, we recommend to perform histology plus immunohistochemistry in parallel to flow cytometry. © 2018 The Authors. Cytometry Part B: Clinical Cytometry published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Clinical Cytometry Society

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here