English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

Multidimensional single‐cell analysis requires approaches to visualize complex data in intuitive 2D graphs. In this regard, t‐distributed stochastic neighboring embedding (tSNE) is the most popular algorithm for single‐cell RNA sequencing and cytometry by time‐of‐flight (CyTOF), but its application to polychromatic flow cytometry, including the recently developed 30‐parameter platform, is still under investigation. We identified differential distribution of background values between samples, generated by either background calculation or spreading error (SE), as a major source of variability in polychromatic flow cytometry data representation by tSNE, ultimately resulting in the identification of erroneous heterogeneity among cell populations. Biexponential transformation of raw data and limiting SE during panel development dramatically improved data visualization. These aspects must be taken into consideration when using computational approaches as discovery tools in large sets of samples from independent experiments or immunomonitoring in clinical trials.

cytometry part a

Background fluorescence and spreading error are major contributors of variability in high‐dimensional flow cytometry data visualization by t‐distributed stochastic neighboring embedding