English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

A fixed‐dose subcutaneous (s.c.) formulation of the anti‐CD20 antibody, rituximab, has been developed to address safety, infusion time, and patient comfort concerns relating to intravenous (i.v.) dosing, and has been approved based upon a pharmacokinetic (PK)–clinical bridging strategy, which demonstrated noninferiority of s.c. vs. i.v. dosing in malignancies, including follicular lymphoma (FL) and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). A clinical development plan was undertaken to identify rituximab s.c. doses achieving noninferior exposure to rituximab i.v., and to confirm PK–clinical bridging, with the same efficacy and similar safety. This drew upon data from 1,579 patients with FL, CLL, or diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma in 5 clinical studies, and showed minimum steady‐state serum concentration (C trough ) as the most appropriate exposure bridging measure. Population PK models were developed, simulations were run using covariates and PK parameters from clinical studies, and exposure–efficacy and –safety analyses performed. Population PKs showed a two‐compartment model with time‐dependent and ‐independent clearances. Clearance and volume were predominantly influenced by body surface area; disposition and elimination were similar for the s.c. and i.v. formulations. After s.c. administration, patients with FL and CLL achieved noninferior exposures to i.v. dosing. Overall, rituximab exposure and route of administration did not influence clinical responses in patients with FL or CLL, and there was no association between exposure and safety events. C trough  was shown to be an effective pharmacologic–clinical bridging parameter for rituximab in patients with FL or CLL. Clinically effective exposures are achieved with either s.c. or i.v. dosing.

Quantitative Clinical Pharmacology Supports the Bridging From i.v. Dosing and Approval of s.c. Rituximab in B‐Cell Hematological Malignancies