Premium
Mocetinostat for patients with previously treated, locally advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma and inactivating alterations of acetyltransferase genes
Author(s) -
Grivas Petros,
Mortazavi Amir,
Picus Joel,
Hahn Noah M.,
Milowsky Matthew I.,
Hart Lowell L.,
Alva Ajjai,
Bellmunt Joaquim,
Pal Sumanta K.,
Bambury Richard M.,
O’Donnell Peter H.,
Gupta Sumati,
Guancial Elizabeth A.,
Sonpavde Guru P.,
Faltaos Demiana,
Potvin Diane,
Christensen James G.,
Chao Richard C.,
Rosenberg Jonathan E.
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
cancer
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.052
H-Index - 304
eISSN - 1097-0142
pISSN - 0008-543X
DOI - 10.1002/cncr.31817
Subject(s) - medicine , nausea , adverse effect , clinical endpoint , population , oncology , gastroenterology , urology , clinical trial , environmental health
Background The authors evaluated mocetinostat (a class I/IV histone deacetylase inhibitor) in patients with urothelial carcinoma harboring inactivating mutations or deletions in CREB binding protein [ CREBBP ] and/or E1A binding protein p300 [ EP300 ] histone acetyltransferase genes in a single‐arm, open‐label phase 2 study. Methods Eligible patients with platinum‐treated, advanced/metastatic disease received oral mocetinostat (at a dose of 70 mg 3 times per week [TIW] escalating to 90 mg TIW) in 28‐day cycles in a 3‐stage study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02236195). The primary endpoint was the objective response rate. Results Genomic testing was feasible in 155 of 175 patients (89%). Qualifying tumor mutations were CREBBP (15%), EP300 (8%), and both CREBBP and EP300 (1%). A total of 17 patients were enrolled into stage 1 (the intent‐to‐treat population); no patients were enrolled in subsequent stages. One partial response was observed (11% [1 of 9 patients; the population that was evaluable for efficacy comprised 9 of the 15 planned patients]); activity was deemed insufficient to progress to stage 2 (null hypothesis: objective response rate of ≤15%). All patients experienced ≥1 adverse event, most commonly nausea (13 of 17 patients; 77%) and fatigue (12 of 17 patients; 71%). The median duration of treatment was 46 days; treatment interruptions (14 of 17 patients; 82%) and dose reductions (5 of 17 patients; 29%) were common. Mocetinostat exposure was lower than anticipated (dose‐normalized maximum serum concentration [C max ] after TIW dosing of 0.2 ng/mL/mg). Conclusions To the authors’ knowledge, the current study represents the first clinical trial using genomic‐based selection to identify patients with urothelial cancer who are likely to benefit from selective histone deacetylase inhibition. Mocetinostat was associated with significant toxicities that impacted drug exposure and may have contributed to modest clinical activity in these pretreated patients. The efficacy observed was considered insufficient to warrant further investigation of mocetinostat as a single agent in this setting.