Premium
Correlation between 3D‐QCA based FFR and quantitative lumen assessment by IVUS for left main coronary artery stenoses
Author(s) -
Tomaniak Mariusz,
Masdjedi Kaneshka,
Zandvoort Laurens J,
Neleman Tara,
Tovar Forero Maria N,
Vermaire Alise,
Kochman Janusz,
Kardys Isabella,
Dekker Wijnand,
Wilschut Jeroen,
Diletti Roberto,
Jaegere Peter,
Van Mieghem Nicolas M,
Zijlstra Felix,
Daemen Joost
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
catheterization and cardiovascular interventions
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.988
H-Index - 116
eISSN - 1522-726X
pISSN - 1522-1946
DOI - 10.1002/ccd.29151
Subject(s) - medicine , fractional flow reserve , intravascular ultrasound , cardiology , stenosis , lumen (anatomy) , unstable angina , artery , radiology , angina , myocardial infarction , coronary angiography
Objectives We aimed to evaluate the feasibility of using three dimensional‐quantitative coronary angiography (3D‐QCA) based fractional flow reserve (FFR) (vessel fractional flow reserve [vFFR], CAAS8.1, Pie Medical Imaging) and to correlate vFFR values with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) for the evaluation of intermediate left main coronary artery (LMCA) stenosis. Background 3D‐QCA derived FFR indices have been recently developed for less invasive functional lesion assessment. However, LMCA lesions were vastly under‐represented in first validation studies. Methods This observational single‐center cohort study enrolled consecutive patients with stable angina, unstable angina, or non‐ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction and nonostial, intermediate grade LMCA stenoses who underwent IVUS evaluation. vFFR was computed based on two angiograms with optimal LMCA stenosis projection and correlated with IVUS‐derived minimal lumen area (MLA). Results A total of 256 patients with intermediate grade LMCA stenosis evaluated with IVUS were screened for eligibility; 147 patients met the clinical inclusion criteria and had a complete IVUS LMCA footage available, of them, 63 patients (63 lesions) underwent 3D‐QCA and vFFR analyses. The main reason for screening failure was insufficient quality of the angiogram (51 patients,60.7%). Mean age was 65 ± 11 years, 75% were male. Overall, mean MLA within LMCA was 8.77 ± 3.17 mm 2 , while mean vFFR was 0.87 ± 0.09. A correlation was observed between vFFR and LMCA MLA ( r = .792, p = .001). The diagnostic accuracy of vFFR ≤0.8 in identifying lesions with MLA < 6.0 mm 2 (sensitivity 98%, specificity 71.4%, area under the curve (AUC) 0.95, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.89–1.00, p = .001) was good. Conclusions In patients with good quality angiographic visualization of LMCA and available complete LMCA IVUS footage, 3D‐QCA based vFFR assessment of LMCA disease correlates well to LMCA MLA as assessed by IVUS.