English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

We have recently demonstrated that the nonlinear relation between ultraviolet and X‐ray luminosity in quasars is very tight (with an intrinsic dispersion of ∼0.2 dex), once contaminants (e.g., dust reddening, X‐ray absorption), variability, and differences in the active galactic nuclei physical properties are taken into account. This relation has thus great potential to advance our understanding in both supermassive black hole accretion physics and observational cosmology, by targeting a single class of objects. Here, we focus on the various contributions to the  observed  X‐ray variability in a homogenous sample of 791 quasars selected from SDSS–DR7 with X‐ray data from the 3XMM–DR7 source catalog. The 250 quasars in this cleaned data set with at least two X‐ray observations typically vary with a  SD  of fractional variation of 15–30% on timescales of weeks/years. Yet, when the count rates are computed at progressively smaller off‐axis values, the same quantity is reduced to roughly 10–25%. This suggests that, when estimating variability indicators, part of the quoted variability amplitude could be due to instrumental/calibration issues rather than  true  variations in the quasar emission.

The nonlinear X‐ray/ultraviolet relation in active galactic nuclei: Contribution of instrumental effects on the X‐ray variability