English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

Aim  Although pulse pressure variation is a good predictor of fluid responsiveness, its measurement is invasive. Therefore, a technically simple, non‐invasive method is needed for evaluating circulatory status to prevent fluid loading and optimize hemodynamic status. We focused in the pulse‐wave transit time (PWTT) defined as the time interval between electrocardiogram R wave to plethysmograph upstroke, which has been recently introduced to non‐invasively assess cardiovascular response. In the present study, we evaluated the efficacy of pulse‐wave transit time (PWTT) with ventilator‐induced variation (PWTTV) in predicting fluid responsiveness.    Methods  We evaluated six domestic pigs weighing 46.0 ± 3.5 kg. After anesthesia induction, electrocardiogram, femoral arterial blood pressure, plethysmograph on the tail, and carotid artery blood flow were monitored and hemorrhage was induced by withdrawing 20 mL/kg blood over 20 min; 5 mL/kg blood volume was then autotransfused over 10 min. Then PWTTV and pulse pressure variation were measured at tidal volumes of 6 and 12 mL/kg.    Results  Area under the receiver operating curve values for the prediction of a >10% change in carotid artery blood flow were 0.979 for pulse pressure variation and 0.993 for PWTTV at a tidal volume of 6 mL/kg and 0.979 and 0.979, respectively, at a tidal volume of 12 mL/kg (all  P  < 0.0001).    Conclusions  Measured non‐invasively, PWTTV showed similar utility to pulse pressure variation in predicting >10% changes in carotid artery blood flow induced by autotransfusion.

Pulse‐wave transit time with ventilator‐induced variation for the prediction of fluid responsiveness