z-logo
Premium
Competition for food in a solitarily foraging folivorous primate ( Lepilemur leucopus )?
Author(s) -
Dröscher Iris,
Kappeler Peter M.
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
american journal of primatology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.988
H-Index - 81
eISSN - 1098-2345
pISSN - 0275-2565
DOI - 10.1002/ajp.22272
Subject(s) - scramble competition , foraging , biology , competition (biology) , ecology , optimal foraging theory , predation , agonistic behaviour , zoology , aggression , psychology , psychiatry
Group‐living folivorous primates can experience competition for food, and feeding competition has also been documented for solitarily foraging gummivorous and omnivorous primates. However, little is known about the types and consequences of feeding competition in solitary folivorous foragers. We conducted this study in the spiny forest of Berenty Reserve, southern Madagascar, to characterize the competitive regime of the nocturnal solitarily foraging white‐footed sportive lemur ( Lepilemur leucopus ), a species that lives in dispersed pairs. We analyzed 1,213 hr of behavioral observations recorded simultaneously for the male and female of each of seven social units and recorded seasonal changes in food availability over a complete annual cycle. Lepilemur leucopus exhibited low selectivity in its dietary choice and mainly included the most abundant plant species in its diet. Contrary to our predictions, we did not find evidence for increased rates of contest (i.e., displacement from food trees) or scramble competition (i.e., shared use of food patches) during the lean season, neither within nor between social units. Instead, conflict rates were low throughout the year, and, during these observations, any feeding stress may have been more related to food quality than quantity. The resource defense hypotheses may not explain pair‐living in this species as there was no indication that males defend food resources for their female pair‐partners. The observed lack of feeding competition may indicate that a cryptic anti‐predator strategy is a better predictor of spatial avoidance of pair‐partners than conflict over food. While anti‐predator benefits of crypsis may explain, at least partly, female‐female avoidance, studies on the relationship between territory size/quality and reproductive success are required to understand whether feeding competition reduces the potential for female association in L. leucopus . Am. J. Primatol. 76:842–854, 2014. © 2014 The Authors. American Journal of Primatology Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here