English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

Objective  The objective of this study was to validate claims‐based algorithms for identifying acute giant cell arteritis (GCA) that will help generate real‐world evidence on comparative effectiveness research and epidemiologic studies. Among patients identified by the GCA algorithm, we further investigated whether GCA flares could be detected by using claims data.    Methods  We developed five claims‐based algorithms based on a combination of  International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision  (ICD‐9) diagnosis codes, specialist visits, and dispensed medications using Medicare Parts A, B, and D linked to electronic medical records (2006‐2014). Acute cases of GCA were determined by chart review using the treating physician’s diagnosis of GCA as the gold standard. Among the patients identified with acute GCA, we assessed if a GCA flare occurred during the year after initial diagnosis.    Results  The number of patients identified by each algorithm ranged from 220 to 896. Positive predictive values (PPVs) of the algorithms ranged from 60.7% to 84.8%. Requirement for disease‐specific workups, multiple diagnosis codes, or specialist visits improved the PPVs. The highest PPV (84.8%) was noted in an algorithm that required two or more diagnosis codes of GCA from inpatient, emergency department, or outpatient rheumatology visits plus a prednisone‐equivalent dose greater than or equal to 40 mg/day occurring 14 days before or after the second ICD‐9 diagnosis date, with the cumulative days’ supply greater than or equal to 14 days. Among patients identified as having GCA, 18.2% of patients had definite evidence of a flare and 25% had a potential flare.    Conclusion  A claims‐based algorithm requiring two or more ICD‐9 diagnosis codes from inpatient, emergency department, or outpatient rheumatology visits and high‐dose glucocorticoid dispensing can be a useful tool to identify acute GCA cases in large administrative claims databases.

Identification of Acute Giant Cell Arteritis in Real‐World Data Using Administrative Claims‐Based Algorithms