Open AccessTofacitinib in Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis and Metabolic Syndrome: A Post hoc Analysis of Phase 3 Studies
Author(s) -
Ritchlin Christopher T.,
Giles Jon T.,
Ogdie Alexis,
GomezReino Juan J.,
Helliwell Philip,
Young Pamela,
Wang Cunshan,
Wu Joseph,
Romero Ana Belén,
Woolcott John,
Stockert Lori
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
acr open rheumatology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2578-5745
DOI - 10.1002/acr2.11166
Subject(s) - medicine , tofacitinib , psoriatic arthritis , placebo , adverse effect , post hoc analysis , arthritis , rheumatoid arthritis , alternative medicine , pathology
Objective Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a cluster of concurrent risk factors for cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes. This post hoc analysis explored key efficacy and safety endpoints in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and MetS treated with tofacitinib. Methods Tofacitinib 5 and 10 mg twice daily and placebo data were pooled from two Phase 3 studies (OPAL Broaden [12 months; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01877668]; OPAL Beyond [6 months; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01882439]); patients received one background conventional synthetic disease‐modifying antirheumatic drug. Patients were stratified by baseline presence/absence of MetS. Efficacy and safety were reported to month 3 (tofacitinib and placebo) and 6 (tofacitinib only). Efficacy outcomes included: American College of Rheumatology (ACR)20/50/70, Health Assessment Questionnaire‐Disability Index (HAQ‐DI) response, Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI)75 response, and enthesitis/dactylitis resolution rates; and changes from baseline (Δ) in C‐reactive protein, HAQ‐DI, Patient’s/Physician’s Global Assessment of Arthritis, and patient‐reported outcomes. Safety outcomes included treatment‐emergent all‐causality adverse events (AEs), Δ in lipid/hepatic values, and liver parameter increases. Results Of 710 patients, 41.4% (n = 294) had baseline MetS. All efficacy outcomes improved with both tofacitinib doses versus placebo, to month 3; tofacitinib efficacy was consistent to month 6, regardless of MetS status. MetS did not appear to affect the incidence of AEs or Δ in lipid/hepatic values with tofacitinib up to month 3 or 6. Arterial thromboembolism and myocardial infarction (adjudicated major adverse cardiovascular events) were each reported once in tofacitinib‐treated patients with MetS. Conclusion Regardless of baseline MetS status, tofacitinib showed greater efficacy versus placebo in patients with active PsA. The tofacitinib safety profile appeared similar in patients with versus without MetS.