English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

Objective  To use unbiased, data‐driven, principal component (PC) and cluster analysis to identify patient phenotypes of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) that might exhibit distinct trajectories of disease progression, response to treatment, and risk for adverse events.    Methods  Patient demographic, socioeconomic, health, and disease characteristics recorded at entry into a large, single‐center, prospective observational registry cohort, the Brigham and Women’s Rheumatoid Arthritis Sequential Study (BRASS), were harmonized using PC analysis to reduce dimensionality and collinearity. The number of PCs was established by eigenvalue >1, cumulative variance, and interpretability. The resulting PCs were used to cluster patients using a K‐means approach. Longitudinal clinical outcomes were compared between the clusters over 2 years.    Results  Analysis of 142 variables from 1,443 patients identified 41 PCs that accounted for 77% of the cumulative variance in the data set. Cluster analysis distinguished 5 patient clusters: 1) less RA disease activity/multimorbidity, shorter RA duration, lower incidence of comorbidities; 2) less RA disease activity/multimorbidity, longer RA duration, more infections, psychiatric comorbidities, health care utilization; 3) moderate RA disease activity/multimorbidity, more neurologic comorbidity; 4) more RA disease activity/multimorbidity, shorter RA duration, more metabolic comorbidity, higher body mass index; 5) more RA disease activity/multimorbidity, longer RA duration, more hepatic, orthopedic comorbidity and RA‐related surgeries. The clusters exhibited differences in clinical outcomes over 2 years of follow‐up.    Conclusion  Data‐driven analysis of the BRASS registry identified 5 distinct phenotypes of RA. These results illustrate the potential of data‐driven patient profiling as a tool to support personalized medicine in RA. Validation in an independent data set is ongoing.

Data‐Driven Patient Clustering and Differential Clinical Outcomes in the Brigham and Women’s Rheumatoid Arthritis Sequential Study Registry