English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

We estimated an impact of the recent CMD-3 measurement of the $e^+e^- \to\pi^+\pi^-$ total cross section at $0.3 < \sqrt{s} < 1.2$ GeV on the leadingorder hadronic contribution $a_\mu^{had,LO}$ to the muon anomalous magneticmoment $a_\mu = (g_\mu-2)/2$, in presence of comparably precise ISRmeasurements of the cross section by BaBar and KLOE experiments being insignificant tension with the CMD-3. Assuming that all the experiments areaffected by yet unidentified systematic effects, to account for the latter, wescaled the experimental uncertainties following the PDG prescription, thusfacilitating a consistent joint fit of the world data on the $e^+e^- \to\pi^+\pi^-$ total cross section. The same procedure was applied in all $e^+e^-\to hadrons$ channels contributing to the dispersive estimate of$a_\mu^{had,LO}$. Despite an inclusion of the new CMD-3 $\pi^+\pi^-$ data, ourestimate $a_\mu^{had,LO}(e^+e^-) = (696.2 \pm 2.9) \times 10^{-10}$ isconsistent with $a_\mu^{had,LO}(e^+e^-)$ values obtained by other authorsbefore publication of the CMD-3 result. Including our $a_\mu^{had,LO}$ valueinto the SM prediction for $a_\mu$, we obtain $a_\mu^{SM} = (11~659~184 \pm4_{\mathrm{tot}}) \times 10^{-10}$ which is by $4.7\sigma$ smaller than theworld average for the experimental value $a_\mu^{exp} = (11~659~205.9 \pm 2.2)\times 10^{-10}$. We confirm the observation by the CMD-3 authors that their$\sigma(e^+e^- \to \pi^+\pi^-)$ measurement, when taken alone, implies the$a_\mu^{SM}$ prediction consistent with the $a_\mu^{exp}$ at $\sim 1\sigma$level.

A comment on the impact of CMD-3 $e^+e^- \to \pi^+\pi^-$ cross section measurement on the SM $g_\mu-2$ value