English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

We present our brief response and some comments to the article [Phys. Rev. C108. 065801 (2023)]. In [Phys. Rev. C 108. 065801 (2023)] contains at least oneunfounded and false statement, and our answer illuminates this explicitly. Wemade a graphical comparison of our results [Phys. Rev. Phys. Rev. C 105, 065806(2022)] with the [Phys. Rev. C 108. 065801 (2023)]. Since in [Phys. Rev. C 108.065801 (2023)] our potentials from [Phys. Rev. C 105, 065806 (2022)] with theslight modification were used, the results of these works are almost identicalbut in [Phys. Rev. C 108. 065801 (2023)] the opposite was stated.

Comments to the paper "Detailed study of the astrophysical direct  capture reaction 6Li(p,g)7Be in a potential model approach" by E. M.  Tursunov, S. A. Turakulov, and K. I. Tursunmakhatov, PHYSICAL REVIEW C 108,  065801 (2023)