English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

With the recognized crisis of credibility in scientific research, there is agrowth of reproducibility studies in computer science, and although existingsurveys have reviewed reproducibility from various perspectives, especiallyvery specific technological issues, they do not address the author-publisherrelationship in the publication of reproducible computational scientificarticles. This aspect requires significant attention because it is the basisfor reliable research. We have found a large gap between thereproducibility-oriented practices, journal policies, recommendations,publisher artifact Description/Evaluation guidelines, submission guides,technological reproducibility evolution, and its effective adoption tocontribute to tackling the crisis. We conducted a narrative survey, acomprehensive overview and discussion identifying the mutual efforts requiredfrom Authors, Journals, and Technological actors to achieve reproducibilityresearch. The relationship between authors and scientific journals in theirmutual efforts to jointly improve the reproducibility of scientific results isanalyzed. Eventually, we propose recommendations for the journal policies, aswell as a unified and standardized Reproducibility Guide for the submission ofscientific articles for authors. The main objective of this work is to analyzethe implementation and experiences of reproducibility policies, techniques andtechnologies, standards, methodologies, software, and data management toolsrequired for scientific reproducible publications. Also, the benefits anddrawbacks of such an adoption, as well as open challenges and promising trends,to propose possible strategies and efforts to mitigate the identified gaps. Tothis purpose, we analyzed 200 scientific articles, surveyed 16 Computer Sciencejournals, and systematically classified them according to reproducibilitystrategies, technologies, policies, code citation, and editorial business. Weconclude there is still a reproducibility gap in scientific publications,although at the same time also the opportunity to reduce this gap with thejoint effort of authors, publishers, and technological providers.

Repeatability, Reproducibility, Replicability, Reusability (4R) in  Journals' Policies and Software/Data Management in Scientific Publications: A  Survey, Discussion, and Perspectives