English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Previous studies have developed different categorizations of Twitter userswho interact with scientific publications online, reflecting the difficulty increating a unified approach. Using Cochrane Review meta-analysis to analyseearlier research (including 79,014 Twitter users, over twenty million tweets,and over five million tweeted publications from 23 studies), we created aconsolidated robust categorization consisting of 11 user categories, atdifferent dimensions, covering most of any future needs for usercategorizations on Twitter and possibly also other social media platforms. Ourfindings showed, with moderate certainty, covering all the earlier differentapproaches employed, that the predominant Twitter group was individual users(66%), responsible for the majority of tweets (55%) and tweeted publications(50%), while organizations (22%, 27%, and 28%, respectively) and sciencecommunicators (16%, 13%, and 30%) clearly contributed smaller proportions. Thecumulative findings from prior investigations indicated a statistically equalextent of academic individuals (33%) and other individuals (28%). Whileacademic individuals shared more academic publications than other individuals(42% vs. 31%), they posted fewer tweets overall (22% vs. 30%), but thesedifferences do not reach statistical significance. Despite significantheterogeneity arising from variations in categorization methods, the findingsconsistently indicate the importance of academics in disseminating academicpublications.

Who Are Tweeting About Academic Publications? A Cochrane Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Altmetric Studies