English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Computing human mental and wellbeing is crucial to various domains, includinghealth, education, and entertainment. However, the reliance on self-reportingin traditional research to establish ground truth often leads to methodologicalinconsistencies and susceptibility to response biases, thus hindering theeffectiveness of modelling. This paper presents the first systematicmethodological review of self-reporting practices in Ubicomp within the contextof human mental and wellbeing computing. Drawing from existing survey research,we establish guidelines for self-reporting in human wellbeing studies andidentify shortcomings in current practices at Ubicomp community. Furthermore,we explore the reliability of self-report as a means of ground truth andpropose directions for improving ground truth measurement in this field.Ultimately, we emphasize the urgent need for methodological advancements toenhance human mental and wellbeing computing.

Critiquing Self-report Practices for Human Mental and Wellbeing Computing at Ubicomp