English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

We investigate how the potential use of algorithms and demonstrative evidencemay affect potential jurors' feelings of reliability, credibility, andunderstanding of expert witnesses and presented evidence. The use ofstatistical methods in forensic science is motivated by a lack of scientificvalidity and error rate issues present in many forensic analysis methods. Weexplore how this new method may be perceived in the courtroom - whereindividuals unfamiliar with advanced statistical methods are asked to evaluateits use in order to assess guilt. In the course of our initial study, wediscovered issues in scale compression of responses and survey format. Wevisually compare participants' notes to the provided transcript by highlightingphrase frequency based on collocations.

Demonstrative Evidence and the Use of Algorithms in Jury Trials