English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The use of Large Language Models (LLMs) for writing has sparked controversyboth among readers and writers. On one hand, writers are concerned that LLMswill deprive them of agency and ownership, and readers are concerned aboutspending their time on text generated by soulless machines. On the other hand,AI-assistance can improve writing as long as writers can conform to publisherpolicies, and as long as readers can be assured that a text has been verifiedby a human. We argue that a system that captures the provenance of interactionwith an LLM can help writers retain their agency, conform to policies, andcommunicate their use of AI to publishers and readers transparently. Thus wepropose HaLLMark, a tool for visualizing the writer's interaction with the LLM.We evaluated HaLLMark with 13 creative writers, and found that it helped themretain a sense of control and ownership of the text.

The HaLLMark Effect: Supporting Provenance and Transparent Use of Large Language Models in Writing with Interactive Visualization