English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

In the realm of text manipulation and linguistic transformation, the questionof authorship has always been a subject of fascination and philosophicalinquiry. Much like the \textbf{Ship of Theseus paradox}, which ponders whethera ship remains the same when each of its original planks is replaced, ourresearch delves into an intriguing question: \textit{Does a text retain itsoriginal authorship when it undergoes numerous paraphrasing iterations?}Specifically, since Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkableproficiency in the generation of both original content and the modification ofhuman-authored texts, a pivotal question emerges concerning the determinationof authorship in instances where LLMs or similar paraphrasing tools areemployed to rephrase the text. This inquiry revolves around \textit{whetherauthorship should be attributed to the original human author or the AI-poweredtool, given the tool's independent capacity to produce text that closelyresembles human-generated content.} Therefore, we embark on a philosophicalvoyage through the seas of language and authorship to unravel this intricatepuzzle.

A Ship of Theseus: Curious Cases of Paraphrasing in LLM-Generated Texts