English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

We consider three algorithms for allocating parliamentary seats byproportional representation. The usual approach to describing such algorithmsis to compute a quota of votes that each party uses to "acquire''representatives. This kind of description follows a divisor method, since thenumber of representatives for a party is equal to the number of votes for thatparty, divided by the quota. We show that a simple multiplicative form withdifferent rounding methods produces algorithms equivalent to the divisormethods. The multiplicative form is intuitive and easier to understand for awider audience.

Algorithms for Proportional Representation in Parliament in Divisor and Multiplicative Form