English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Human bias is capable of changing the analysis of measured data sufficientlyto alter the results of an experiment. It is incumbent upon modern experiments,especially those investigating quantities considered contentious in the broadercommunity, to blind their analysis in an effort to minimize bias. The choice ofa blinding model is experiment specific, but should also aim to preventaccidental release of results before an analysis is finalized. In this paper,we discuss common threats to an unbiased analysis, as well as common quantitiesthat can be blinded in different types of nuclear physics experiments. We usethe Muon Scattering Experiment as an example, and detail the blinding schemeused therein.

Blinding for precision scattering experiments: The MUSE approach as a case study